If you’re ready to pull the trigger on that long-awaited new construction or renovation project, but you don’t know how to make the magic happen, read on.
A project delivery method is the way an owner organizes and pays for construction. The approach you choose determines who will oversee the project, communicate directly with you from concept through completion and assume the project’s financial risk.
Each project delivery method has its advantages and disadvantages. The type of project can also be a factor in which approach you choose. This crash course explains the key options that are available to you and the pros and cons of these approaches.
Delivery methods deconstructed
Krusinski Construction Company’s key construction relationships and project delivery methods include design-bid-build, design-build, design-assist and construction manager at risk, which involves a cost-plus-fee contract. Read on to learn how each approach works.
Design-bid-build
This is the traditional approach to construction and the one with which owners are most familiar. If you want to participate in the design process and your project isn’t schedule-sensitive, this method could be the best one for you.
If you choose this strategy, you’ll start by hiring an architect to design your building. Once you’re satisfied with the design, the architect will help you find potential contractors, who will submit competitive bids for the project. After selecting the contractor, you’ll sign a separate contract with the construction company.
Pros: You’ll be able to influence the design by working with the architect directly. Getting the design up front gives contractors the same plans and specifications to bid on, which means you’ll be able to compare quotes on a level playing field.
Cons: This method focuses on bid price rather than the final cost of the project. Since all bidding contractors will only include what the drawings show, you could end up paying more if the drawings have any scope gaps. Design revisions and change orders can blow your budget and schedule. Another big disadvantage with design-bid-build is that you don’t get the benefit of having a contractor’s input on budget, schedule, constructability issues, and alternate materials and systems. Finally, projects tend to take longer because one phase doesn’t begin until the previous phase is complete.
Design-build
In a hurry? This may be the way to go. This single-source delivery combines the design and construction in one contract. Using this option, you’ll hire a contractor or an architect — whichever you prefer — as your main contact. Typically, owners will select a contractor who, with help from an architect of the contractor’s choosing, will design and construct the building. If you contract with an architect first, the architect will select and work with the contractor directly. In either case, the owner, contractor and architect work as a team to design and build the project.
Pros: These projects are well-suited for fast-track construction because design and construction often overlap. For example, an architect could complete a building’s interior designs while the contractor does the site and foundation work. Getting the contractor involved in the design process right away improves collaboration and often increases price certainty for an owner.
Cons: Opponents contend that design-build contracts undermine the inherent checks and balances between design and construction teams because the teams don’t work independently as they do in other approaches. This criticism, however, is unwarranted. Since project team members work in unity, they all assume equal responsibility for any flaw in the project.
Design-assist
Design-assist is a blend of design-build and traditional bid contracts. An owner executes the design contract with the architect and brings in a contractor early on to provide input into the design process. This allows an owner to “marry” his choices for architect and contractor and allows the team to detect and resolve design challenges and constructability issues long before construction begins.
Pros: This model facilitates fast-track construction and also promotes early contractor involvement to incorporate preliminary budgets, constructability issues and alternate methods. As an owner, you get the best of both worlds by choosing your team members and working with them in a coordinated effort.
Cons: The architect and contractor have no contractual obligation to each other and, therefore, it may be difficult to resolve certain design or budget issues. Also, the architect and contractor may not be familiar with each other, which may create a learning curve hurdle early on.
Construction manager at risk (cost-plus-fee contract)
If you’re a busy owner who would rather have less direct involvement in a project, you can hand the reins over to a construction manager (CM), who will act as your agent and represent your interests. After contracting with a CM, the CM will hire the architect and collaborate with the design team while overseeing the design, cost and schedule. The CM will also hire the subcontractors, who will build the project, and make sure everything goes smoothly until the project is done. A good CM will help reduce overall costs.
Pros: Busy owners can step back from a project and let someone else — the CM — do all the work. Having an experienced CM manage day-to-day project operations can help ensure a smoother ride. This project delivery method also provides a defined maximum price, which typically includes a shared-savings clause between the CM and the owner to help speed completion. Finally, fast-track construction is possible with this method because construction can begin before the design is completed.
Cons: The perception is that the CM will not be diligent about keeping costs low because his fee is based on the final price. As result, it’s important to hire a CM you trust and who has an open-book policy. You also need to be sure that the CM has ample experience to avoid potential scope gaps because you’ll have to pick up the tab for any change orders.
The bottom line
Which project delivery method you choose will depend on your goals, time and cost constraints, and risk aversion. Krusinski works hand in hand with owners and project teams to identify the ideal approach within these parameters. When you can make an informed decision, you’ll save time, money and worry.
To learn more about Krusinski’s project delivery methods, contact Jeff Krusinski at jeffk@krusinski.com.
|